Hoaxblog.com
Pages:
Categories:
- Apache (6)
- backup (1)
- cache (2)
- Cpanel/WHM (11)
- ddos (1)
- exam (1)
- file hosting (2)
- General (11)
- Hosting (1)
- It’s me (2)
- linux (1)
- Linux Shell (14)
- Make Money Online (2)
- Mysql (2)
- mysqldump (1)
- php (1)
- Programming (3)
- proxy (1)
- Reseller (1)
- SEO (1)
- Servers (21)
- VPN (1)
- Windows (6)
- wordpress (1)
Blogroll
Meta:
Archive for the 'Make Money Online' Category
01 11th, 2008
Today morning, i got a new idea in mind. I was thinking to run a File hosting for a long time, but because of the network connectivity problem with my current server, and having loaded customers i have never got any success. In the recent time i got a Full Dedicated Windows Server at too much cheap rate from Burst network. Why dont use it for the file hosting service? I got my warez blog and its really running very smoothly for last few weeks, so easily a file hosting can generate around 20-50$ revenue for me
By the way, i m not good with windows dedicated servers, as i haven’t work with them before, so thinking to gather some experience now, and why not if some bucks is related to it? ![]()
10 27th, 2007
I personally a fan of Widgetbucks already. Although, seeing loads of Rumour about WB these days. About a recent update in Widgetbucks loading problem, there are loads of comments. Shoemoney claimed that this update was a kind of bum for the publishers. It has just changed some javascript code into html (They are saying it as hidden Link). Although, here is the reply from widgetbucks and looks quite bashing :
The second misperception relates to back-links and why we removed them. Our original intent behind including back-links was pretty plain and simple: if a user did not have the Flash Player installed, we wanted to show a link to WidgetBucks, and disabling javascript does nothing more than reproduce the No-Flash-Player case, since javascript is used to load the flash player. We removed the back-link based on publisher feedback about not being allowed to modify the HTML to place a “no-follow” for SEO purposes. So rather than grant permission to modify the HTML we provide, we simply removed the back-link.
Aye Aye Widgetbucks, keep going ![]()